🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear he was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

For example, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for using too much that system. Hire the process guy and later bin him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.